While tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT may be beneficial for individual creativity, the study also found that they reduce creativity at a population level.
A study published on Friday warned that if the creative industries adopt artificial intelligence to help with story writing, future books and films could start to all look the same.
The study involved hundreds of volunteers. Scientific advancesThis comes amid growing concern about the impact of widely available AI tools that can turn simple text prompts into relatively sophisticated music, art and writing.
“Our goal was to explore to what extent and how generative AI can aid human creativity,” Anil Doshi of University College London told AFP.
For the experiment, Doshi and co-author Oliver Hauser of the University of Exeter recruited around 300 volunteers to act as “writers.”
These were people who did not make a living from writing, and their innate creativity was assessed by a standard psychological test that asked them to name ten completely different words.
The scientists then randomly divided the participants into three groups and asked them to write an eight-sentence story about one of three themes: an adventure on the open sea, an adventure in the jungle, or an adventure on another planet.
Participants were randomly divided into three groups that received different levels of AI assistance.
The first group was given no assistance, the second group was provided with a three-sentence story idea by ChatGPT, and the third group could receive up to five AI-generated story ideas to get started.
Individual Gain, Collective Loss
After participants finished writing their stories, they were asked to rate the creativity of their stories on criteria such as how original they were, how enjoyable they were, and how likely their idea was to be published as a book.
An additional 600 external reviewers also evaluated the articles using the same criteria.
The authors found that, on average, AI improved an individual writer’s creative quality by up to 10 percent and their story’s enjoyment by 22 percent, particularly helping with elements such as structure and plot twists.
These effects were most pronounced for writers who were judged to be the least creative in the first assignment, “so it’s kind of a levelling-the-playing-field effect,” Doshi said.
However, on a collective level, they found that writers “anchored” themselves too strongly to the ideas proposed, resulting in AI-assisted stories being much more similar to each other than stories produced without AI assistance.
Hauser said this creates a “social dilemma”: On the one hand, “it makes it easier for people to participate — lowering the barriers is a good thing,” but if the overall novelty of the arts is reduced, “it could be harmful in the future.”
Doshi said the study showed that just as giving a child a calculator too early could prevent them from mastering basic arithmetic, there were also risks of becoming too reliant on AI tools before they have mastered fundamental skills like writing and music.
People need to start thinking about, “Where can I insert this tool into my workflow to get the most benefit while still having my say in the project and the outcome?”
For more information:
Anil Doshi et al., “Generative AI enhances individual creativity but reduces the collective diversity of novel content” Scientific advances (2024). DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn5290. Science
© 2024 AFP
Quote: AI makes writing easier, but stories sound similar (July 13, 2024) Retrieved July 14, 2024, from https://phys.org/news/2024-07-ai-easier-stories-alike.html
This document is subject to copyright. It may not be reproduced without written permission, except for fair dealing for the purposes of personal study or research. The content is provided for informational purposes only.
